Page 3 - 2017-04-CFR Volume 103 Gypsum Yes or No - April 2017
P. 3

Why Does Gypsum Have Bad Reputation?

      In the past there was a lack of product/market stew-
      ardship by some gypsum concrete manufacturers
      and market conditions created by GC’s to “value en-
      gineer” projects with gypsum products that frankly
      weren’t that great.  Value-engineering resulted in
      compromised quality (low cost = over-sanded/over-
      watered underlayment). In other words the stuff you
      think gypsum still is. Another reason is that in the
      past, most multi-family projects used carpet and pad
      which “covered” a multitude of sins in the substrate.
      Recent trends towards using resilient products
      “uncovered” sub-standard underlayments.  USG in
      particular has “raised the bar” by increasing base-line
      compressive strength from 1500 – 1800 to 2500 psi
      minimum and created user-friendly state-of -the art
      formulations that require
      less water of convenience
      yet increased flow creating
      a self-leveling product with
      high strength.  They have
      developed close contact
      with contractors and insti-
      tuted educational and
      quality programs for “hand
      -picked” contractors.


      Flooring manufacturers are not up to speed on gyp-
      sum concrete innovations and technologies and as a
      result are skeptical to recognize or endorse these
      products even though they are in the ASTM F 710
      and F 492 standards. Flooring manufacturers need to
      recognize and open lines of communication to ad-
      dress issues. The resilient flooring industry must rec-
      ognize that they are not requiring 3,000 psi underlay-
      ment under their resilient products because they call
      out “commercial” applications for 3,000 psi ONLY.
      Multi-family is NOT commercial. They are two sepa-
      rate architectural divisions. If all resilient flooring
      manufacturers simply required a 3,000 psi under all
      resilient products, regardless of architectural division,
      this would force GC’s, architects and gypsum con-
      crete manufacturers to play on an “even field.”


      The Attributes of “New” Gypsum:

      Gypsum flooring products today are nothing like the
      gypsum products of the past that have spurned so
      many to question their validity, quality and perfor-
      mance characteristics.  As with so many things today
      that create change, skepticism is hard to over-come.


      3                                            Commercial Flooring Report                                 April 2017
   1   2   3   4   5   6