706-370-5888 lgmtcs@optilink.us

Here’s an interesting situation that we were confronted with the other day, and lately it seems we get these types of situations on a regular basis; never dull in this business.

A flooring contractor was storing, before installation, the gross amount of carpet material ordered for a project.  His client, a user of quite a bit of carpet for apartments, was questioning why he had to pay for all of the material storage if he was only going to be installing some of it.  I’ll explain what “some of it” means.  The sizes of the cuts to be installed were 10 x 10’3’’. The size of the material necessary to achieve these cuts is 12 x 10’ 3’’.  The gross size of this product would have to be 12 feet by whatever length the roll came in and however much material is necessary to cover the total square yardage needed for the project.  The client didn’t think they should have to pay for storing more carpet than they were actually going to use.  The dealer asked us if there was a published industry standard for storage of material.  He was told there is no industry standard for storing material and I thought it was ridiculous for his client to request they only be charged for what amounts to a lot of 10 x 10’3’’ cuts as opposed to 12 x 10’3’’ cuts.  Who does this kind of thing!?  Then I thought maybe some of you should know about this too since you may have gotten the same kind of goofy request at one time. 

Carpet comes in standard widths of 6 foot, 12 foot, 13 foot 2 inches, 13 foot 6 inches or 15 foot or anywhere in between if necessary depending on your custom desires.  Most common is 12 foot wide carpet.  Regardless of what you need for a job you have to order in the standard size the material comes in.  As a result there is always going to be overage, waste and scrap material.  The same would be true of wallpaper, lumber, or any type of yard goods.  The customer gets charged for what is ordered not installed or used.  When you see a new house being built, you also see scraps of lumber, brick, roofing material, and so on.  The homeowner has to pay for all of that stuff; you don’t walk around picking up the scrap and asking for a credit on it.  The same is true of paying for what is ordered with flooring material and storing it, if applicable.

There is waste in packaged flooring material as well, such as vinyl tile, ceramic, stone, wood and laminate.  The customer pays for what is in the box.  If they order volumes of it and its stored prior to installation and storage fees are part of the sale, they pay for storing all the material, not just what will ultimately be used for installation minus waste. 

All of this is standard practice in the industry.  It is not a set guideline and there are no established standards but it is a common, everyday, reasonably understood business practice in the floor covering industry.  In the case we are describing the dealers client wanted proof that this was the case so we wrote him a letter that describes how the industry functions relative to paying for what is ordered for the installation and thus what would be stored for the order if it was sizeable and to be undertaken over a period of time or the job had to wait for whatever reason.  If customers are going to be this picky and absurd just think what they could be like when the product actually gets installed.  It might be a nightmare you don’t want to have.  I’d be skeptical at that point and leery of what other foolish thought they’d come up with as we went along. 

This may be more of an issue to most of you relative to waste on a job as opposed to material storage for a job.  Most flooring dealers don’t charge for storing materials, unless you’re involved in commercial type work or large projects.  At that point you may include storage just to get the job or it may be standard practice to charge storage because you do so much of this type of work.  We’d be more apt to see a customer complain or question material waste on a job.  This is one of the reasons so many dealers try to measure the job as close as possible, to avoid waste and any conflicts it may cause.  I’d rather have more waste with a better layout and less seaming, if possible and then explain to the customer why it was done this way and what the alternative would have been.  Most people will accept and understand if you explain your actions and reasoning, especially if it’s ultimately to their benefit. 

People can sometimes be very unreasonable and question what you may think is unquestionable or common thought for you.  One thing I’ve always tried to be conscious of is explaining what’s going on instead of assuming a customer knows or is aware of what’s happening.  They only buy floor covering on occasion or have a problem on occasion or may be new to the whole process, so you have to be flexible in dealing with them, almost like starting over with each new client.  This case of storage and questioning the charge for it may have been a simple misunderstanding from actually not knowing or the conscious act of an unscrupulous person actually trying to fleece this guy.  In this case, I think I’d have to go with the fleecing.

Author: Lewis G. Migliore

LGM and Associates – The Floorcovering Experts